Optimal Handed Care review: Client ID LA-EXAMPLE-01
Illustrative example. A fictional case in the format we deliver, so commissioners can see what a decision-ready report contains. It is not a real person and not clinical advice.
- Referred by
- Adult Social Care, review team
- Setting
- Own home, ground floor
- Priority
- Amber: seen within 9 working days
- Assessed by
- Occupational therapist, HCPC registered
- Date of visit
- [date]
- Present
- The person, daughter, two regular carers
1. The question asked
Is two-carer support still required for transfers and personal care, or can any task be delivered safely by one carer with the right method and equipment?
2. Summary and recommendation
- Bed to chair and chair to commode: one carer with a standing and raising aid, after an observed trial on two visits. Retain two carers for the first two weeks while the provider signs off competence.
- Repositioning in bed: two carers with slide sheets remain necessary. Sitting balance and shoulder pain make a single-carer method unsafe.
- Personal care in bed: two carers until the profiling bed is replaced (current bed does not reach a working height; see 6).
- Net effect: daytime transfers move to one carer; morning and evening bed care stays double-handed. Reviewed at 4 weeks and on any trigger.
3. What was observed
| Sit to stand | Stands from the bed edge with a standing aid on the second attempt; takes weight through both legs for up to 20 seconds; fatigues after two repetitions. Verbal prompts followed reliably. |
|---|---|
| Sitting balance | Independent when feet are supported; leans right after 3 to 4 minutes; cannot correct without cueing. |
| Bed mobility | Bridges with cueing; cannot roll independently; right shoulder pain limits pushing up. Slide sheets needed for repositioning. |
| Cognition and consent | Understands the assessment and consents; short-term memory affects carry-over, so cues must be the same every time. |
| Pain and skin | Right shoulder pain 4/10 on movement; sacral skin intact; heels intact; sits out for up to 3 hours. |
4. Risk assessment (TILE)
| Task | Transfers 6 to 8 times a day; repositioning 4 times; personal care twice. |
|---|---|
| Individual | Weight 71 kg; partial weight bearing; right shoulder pain; fatigue; needs consistent cues. |
| Load and equipment | Standing and raising aid (SWL 150 kg) suitable for transfers; slide sheets for bed; current bed is fixed height (risk to carers). |
| Environment | Bedroom 3.1 × 2.8 m; turning space adequate once the bedside cabinet is moved; laminate floor; commode chair fits the route. |
| Residual risk after controls | Low for transfers with one trained carer; moderate for bed care until the bed is changed. |
5. Clinical reasoning
Transfers are an active task the person can contribute to, so a standing aid preserves function and reduces the handling load compared with a hoist. The person's leg strength and prompt-following were consistent across the visit, which supports a single carer for that task. Repositioning is different: sitting balance and shoulder pain remove the person's contribution, and a single-carer slide sheet method would place the carer at the bed side beyond a safe reach on a fixed-height bed. The alternative (a hoist for all tasks) was rejected because it would remove participation without lowering the risk.
6. Equipment
- Standing and raising aid: [make and model], SWL 150 kg, knee pad at setting 3, handles at the upper position. LOLER thorough examination in date; next due [date].
- Slide sheets: two flat sheets, tubular for repositioning, kept on the bed.
- Profiling bed: recommended to replace the fixed-height bed; ordered through the community equipment service. Until then bed care stays double-handed.
7. The plan carers follow
- Feet on the plate, knees against the pad, hands on the handles; "ready, steady, stand" and a pause before the turn.
- Stop points: pain in the right shoulder above 4/10, knees giving way, dizziness, or the person asking to stop.
- Two carers for all bed tasks; slide sheets; cues agreed and written the same way every time.
- Competency: the provider signs off each carer on the real task before they deliver it alone.
8. Review triggers and date
- Any fall, new pain, a change in weight bearing, sitting balance, cognition or skin.
- New equipment, a change of carer team, or the profiling bed arriving (bed care re-assessed then).
- Scheduled review at 4 weeks regardless.
9. Outcome measures agreed with the commissioner
| Baseline | Two carers, 8 visits a day, 14 care hours a week attributed to double-handed tasks. |
|---|---|
| After implementation | Two carers for two visits a day; one carer for the rest. Reported as hours actually delivered, not modelled. |
| Safety | Incidents and near misses reported by the provider at 4 weeks. |
| Person's experience | Asked at review: comfort, confidence, dignity. |
10. Sign-off
Illustrative document. Real reports are shared only through the commissioning organisation's agreed route and never contain more identifying information than the client reference. Thrive Better Living Ltd, company 15248600.